Lombok is a tool that generates code like getters, setters, constructors, equals, hashCode, toString for us in the same way that our IDE does. While IDE generates all these things in our source code file, Lombok generates them directly in the class file.

So Lombok basically takes out all these things from your source code to bytecode so we don't need to write them in our source code which means less code in our source code file. And in this article, I am going to explain how Lombok can help us in removing this kind of boilerplate code.

To understand it let's suppose we have an entity class Employee and we want to use it to hold a single employee record. We can use it as a DTO or persistent entity or anything else we want but idea is that we want to use it to store id, firstName, lastName and salary fields.

For this requirement, we will need a simple Employee POJO and according to General directions for creating Plain Old Java Object,
  • Each variable in a POJO should be declared as private.
  • Default constructor should be overridden with public accessibility.
  • Each variable should have its Setter-Getter method with public accessibility.
  • POJO should override equals(), hashCode() and toString() methods of Object.
And generally our Employee class will look like

public class Employee {
  private long id;
  private int salary;
  private String firstName;
  private String lastName;

  public Employee() {

  public long getId() {
    return id;
  public void setId(long id) {
    this.id = id;
  public int getSalary() {
    return salary;
  public void setSalary(int salary) {
    this.salary = salary;
  public String getFirstName() {
    return firstName;
  public void setFirstName(String firstName) {
    this.firstName = firstName;
  public String getLastName() {
    return lastName;
  public void setLastName(String lastName) {
    this.lastName = lastName;

  public boolean equals(Object o) {
    if (this == o) return true;
    if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;

    Employee employee = (Employee) o;

    if (id != employee.id) return false;
    if (salary != employee.salary) return false;
    if (!firstName.equals(employee.firstName)) return false;
    if (!lastName.equals(employee.lastName)) return false;

    return true;

  public int hashCode() {
    int result = (int) (id ^ (id >>> 32));
    result = 31 * result + firstName.hashCode();
    result = 31 * result + lastName.hashCode();
    result = 31 * result + salary;
    return result;

  public String toString() {
    return "Employee{" +
           "id=" + id +
           ", firstName='" + firstName + '\'' +
           ", lastName='" + lastName + '\'' +
           ", salary=" + salary +

But generally, we always use auto-generation strategies of our IDE to generate getters, setters, default constructor, hashCode, equals and toString e.g. alt+insert in IntelliJ.

As you can see the size of Employee class is more than 50 lines where field declaration is contributing only 4 lines. And these things are not directly contributing anything to our business logic but just increasing the size of our code.

Project Lombok provides a way to remove above boilerplate code and simplify development process while still providing these functionalities at the bytecode level. With project Lombok, we can combine all these things within 10 lines

public class Employee {
  private long id;
  private int salary;
  private String firstName;
  private String lastName;

With @Data annotation on top of our class Lombok will process our Java source code and produce a class file which will have getters, setters, default arg constructor, hasCode, equals and toString methods in it. So basically Lombok is doing the trick and instead of us adding all those things in our source code and then compiling it a class file Lombok is automatically adding all these things directly to our class files.

But if we need to write some business code in our getters or setters or in any of above method or we want trick these methods to function a little bit differently, we can still write that method in our class and Lombok will not override it while producing all these stuff in bytecode.

In order to make it works, we need to
  1. Install Lombok plugin in our IDE e.g. In IntelliJ we can install it from Settings -> Plugins -> Browse Repositories window.installing-lombok-plugin-in-intellij-idea
  2. Enable annotation processing e.g. In IntelliJ we need to check “Enable annotation processing” option on Settings -> Compiler -> Annotation Processors window.enabling-annotation-in-intellij-idea
  3. Include Lombok jar in our build path, we can do it by adding the Lombok dependency in pom.xml file if we are using maven or we will need to download the Lombok jar manually and add it to our classpath.
Lombok provides a variety of annotations which we can use and manipulate according to our need. Some of these annotations are
  • @NonNull Can be used with fields, methods, parameters, and local variables to check for NullPointerException.
  • @Cleanup Provides automatic resource management and ensures the variable declaration that you annotate will be cleaned up by calling its close method. Seems similar to Java’s try-with-resource.
    @Cleanup InputStream in = new FileInputStream("filename");
  • @Getter/@Setter Can be used on class or field to generate getters and setters automatically for every field inside the class or for a particular field respectively.
    @Getter @Setter private long id;
  • @ToString Generates a default toString method
  • @EqualsAndHashCode Generates hashCode and equals implementations from the fields of your object.
    @ToString(exclude = "salary")
    @EqualsAndHashCode(exclude = "salary")
  • @NoArgsConstructor , @RequiredArgsConstructor and @AllArgsConstructor Generates constructors that take no arguments, one argument per final / non-null field, or one argument for every field.
  • @Data A shortcut for @ToString , @EqualsAndHashCode , @Getter on all fields, and @Setter on all non-final fields, and @RequiredArgsConstructor .
  • @Value is the immutable variant of @Data, Helps in making our class Immutable.
  • @Builder annotation will generate nice static factory methods in our class which we can use to create objects of our class in more oriented manner e.g. if we will add “@Builder” annotation to our Employee class then we can create object of Employee in the following manner
    Employee emp = Employee.builder()
  • @SneakyThrows Allows us to throw checked exceptions without actually declaring this in our method’s throws clause, e.g.
    public void doSomeThing() {
      // According to some business condition throw some business exception
      throw new Exception();
  • @Synchronized A safer variant of the synchronized method modifier.
  • @CommonsLog, @JBossLog, @Log, @Log4j, @Log4j2, @Slf4j and @XSlf4j which produces log fields in our class and let us use that field for logging. e.g. If we will mark a class with @CommonsLog Lombok will attach below field to our class.
    private static final org.apache.commons.logging.Log log = org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory.getLog(YourClass.class);
You can also go to the official website of project Lombok for the complete feature list and examples.

Advantages of Lombok

  • Lombok helps us remove boilerplate code and decrease line of unnecessary code
  • It makes our code highly maintainable, we don’t need to worry about regenerating hashCode, equals, toString, getters, and setters whenever we change our properties.
  • Lombok provides an efficient builder API to build our object by using @Builder
  • Lombok provides efficient way to make our class Immutable by using @Value
  • Provides other annotations like @Log - for logging, @Cleanup - for cleaning resources automatically, @SneakyThrows  - for throwing checked exception without adding try-catch or throws statement and @Synchronized to make our methods synchronized.

Disadvantages of Lombok

The only disadvantage Lombok comes with is its dependency, If you are using it then everyone in your project must use it and configure it (install the plugin and enable annotation processing) to successfully compile the project. And all your project mates need to be aware of it otherwise, they will not be able to build the project and receive lots of compilation errors. However, this is only an initial step and will not take more than a couple of minutes.
This is my third article on Java Cloning series, In previous articles Java Cloning and Types of Cloning (Shallow and Deep) in Details with Example and Java Cloning - Copy Constructor versus Cloning I had discussed Java cloning in detail and explained every concept like what is cloning, how does it work, what are the necessary steps we need to follow to implement cloning, how to use Object.clone(), what is Shallow and Deep cloning, how to achieve cloning using serialization and Copy constructors and advantages copy of copy constructors over Java cloning.

If you have read those articles you can easily understand why it is good to use Copy constructors over cloning or Object.clone(). In this article, I am going to discuss why copy constructors are not sufficient?


Yes, you are reading it right copy constructors are not sufficient by themselves, copy constructors are not polymorphic because constructors do not get inherited to the child class from the parent class. If we try to refer a child object from parent class reference, we will face problems in cloning it using the copy constructor. To understand it let’s take examples of two classes Mammal and Human where Human extends MammalMammal class have one field type and two constructors, one to create the object and one copy constructor to create a copy of an object

class Mammal {

    protected String type;

    public Mammal(String type) {
        this.type = type;

    public Mammal(Mammal original) {
        this.type = original.type;

    public String getType() {
        return type;

    public void setType(String type) {
        this.type = type;

    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if (this == o) return true;
        if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;

        Mammal mammal = (Mammal) o;

        if (!type.equals(mammal.type)) return false;

        return true;

    public int hashCode() {
        return type.hashCode();

    public String toString() {
        return "Mammal{" + "type='" + type + "'}";

And Human class which extends Mammal class, have one name field, one normal constructor and one copy constructor to create a copy

class Human extends Mammal {

    protected String name;

    public Human(String type, String name) {
        this.name = name;

    public Human(Human original) {
        this.name = original.name;

    public String getName() {
        return name;

    public void setName(String name) {
        this.name = name;

    public boolean equals(Object o) {
        if (this == o) return true;
        if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
        if (!super.equals(o)) return false;

        Human human = (Human) o;

        if (!type.equals(human.type)) return false;
        if (!name.equals(human.name)) return false;

        return true;

    public int hashCode() {
        int result = super.hashCode();
        result = 31 * result + name.hashCode();
        return result;

    public String toString() {
        return "Human{" + "type='" + type + "', name='" + name + "'}";

Here in both copy constructors we are doing deep cloning.

Now let’s create objects for both classes

Mammal mammal = new Mammal("Human");
Human human = new Human("Human", "Naresh");

Now if we want to create a clone for mammal or human, we can simply do it by calling their respective copy constructor

Mammal clonedMammal = new Mammal(mammal);
Human clonedHuman = new Human(human);

We will get no error in doing this and both objects will be cloned successfully, as we can see below tests

System.out.println(mammal == clonedMammal); // false
System.out.println(mammal.equals(clonedMammal)); // true

System.out.println(human == clonedHuman); // false
System.out.println(human.equals(clonedHuman)); // true

But what if we try to refer object of Human from the reference of Mammal

Mammal mammalHuman = new Human("Human", "Mahesh");

In order to clone mammalHuman, we can not use constructor Human, It will give us compilation error because type mammalHuman is Mammal and constructor of Human class accept Human.

Mammal clonedMammalHuman = new Human(mammalHuman); // compilation error

And if we try clone mammalHuman using copy constructor of Mammal, we will get the object of Mammal instead of Human but mammalHuman holds the object of Human

Mammal clonedMammalHuman = new Mammal(mammalHuman);

So both mammalHuman and clonedMammalHuman are not the same objects as you see in the output below code

System.out.println("Object " + mammalHuman + " and copied object " + clonedMammalHuman + " are == : " + (mammalHuman == clonedMammalHuman));
System.out.println("Object " + mammalHuman + " and copied object " + clonedMammalHuman + " are equal : " + (mammalHuman.equals(clonedMammalHuman)) + "\n");


Object Human{type='Human', name='Mahesh'} and copied object Mammal{type='Human'} are == : false
Object Human{type='Human', name='Mahesh'} and copied object Mammal{type='Human'} are equal : false

As we can see copy constructors suffer from inheritance problems and they are not polymorphic as well. So how can we solve this problem, Well there various solutions like creating static Factory methods or creating some generic class which will do this for us and the list will go on?

But there is a very easy solution which will require copy constructors and will be polymorphic as well. We can solve this problem using defensive copy methods, a method which we are going to include in our classes and call copy constructor from it and again override it the child class and call its copy constructor from it.

Defensive copy methods will also give us the advantage of dependency injection, we can inject dependency instead of making our code tightly coupled we can make it loosely coupled, we can even create an interface which will define our defensive copy method and then implement it in our class and override that method.

So in Mammal class, we will create a no-argument method cloneObject however, we are free to name this method anything like clone or copy or copyInstance

public Mammal cloneObject() {
    return new Mammal(this);

And we can override same in “Human” class

public Human cloneObject() {
    return new Human(this);

Now to clone mammalHuman we can simply say

Mammal clonedMammalHuman = mammalHuman.clone();

And for the last two sys out we will get below output which is our expected behaviour.

Object Human{type='Human', name='Mahesh'} and copied object Human{type='Human', name='Mahesh'} are == : false
Object Human{type='Human', name='Mahesh'} and copied object Human{type='Human', name='Mahesh'} are equal : true

As we can see apart from getting the advantage of polymorphism this option also gives us freedom from passing any argument.

You can found complete code in CopyConstructorExample Java file on Github and please feel free to give your valuable feedback.
In my previous article Java Cloning and Types of Cloning (Shallow and Deep) in Details with Example, I have discussed Java Cloning in details and answered questions about how we can use cloning to copy objects in Java, what are two different types of cloning (Shallow & Deep) and how we can implement both of them, if you haven’t read it please go ahead.

In order to implement cloning, we need to configure our classes to follow the below steps
  • Implement Cloneable interface in our class or its superclass or interface,
  • Define clone() method which should handle CloneNotSupportedException (either throw or log),
  • And in most cases from our clone() method we call the clone() method of the superclass.
Java Cloning versus Copy Constructor

And super.clone() will call its super.clone() and the chain will continue until call will reach to clone() method of the Object class which will create a field by field mem copy of our object and return it back.

Like everything Cloning also comes with its advantages and disadvantages. However, Java cloning is more famous its design issues but still, it is the most common and popular cloning strategy present today.

Advantages of Object.clone()

Object.clone() have many design issues but it is still the popular and easiest way  of copying objects, Some advantages of using clone() are
  • Cloning requires very less line of code, just an abstract class with 4 or 5 line long clone() method but we will need to override it if we need deep cloning.
  • It is the easiest way of copying object especially if we are applying it to an already developed or an old project. We just need to define a parent class, implement Cloneable in it, provide the definition of clone() method and we are ready every child of our parent will get the cloning feature. 
  • We should use clone to copy arrays because that’s generally the fastest way to do it.
  • As of release 1.5, calling clone on an array returns an array whose compile-time
    type is the same as that of the array being cloned which clearly means calling clone on arrays do not require typecasting.

Disadvantages of Object.clone()

Below are some cons due to which many developers don't use Object.clone()
  • Using Object.clone() method requires us to add lots of syntax to our code like implement Cloneable interface, define clone() method and handle CloneNotSupportedException and finally call to Object.clone() and cast it our object.
  • The Cloneable interface lacks clone() method, actually, Cloneable is a marker interface and doesn’t have any method in it and still, we need to implement it just to tell JVM that we can perform clone() on our object.
  • Object.clone() is protected so we have to provide our own clone() and indirectly call Object.clone() from it.
  • We don’t have any control over object construction because Object.clone() doesn’t invoke any constructor.
  • If we are writing the clone method in a child class e.g. Person then all of its superclasses should define clone() method in them or inherit it from another parent class otherwise super.clone() chain will fail.
  • Object.clone() support only shallow copy so reference fields of our newly cloned object will still hold objects which fields of our original object were holding. In order to overcome this, we need to implement clone() in every class whose reference our class is holding and then call their clone them separately in our clone() method like in below example.
  • We can not manipulate final fields in Object.clone() because final fields can only be changed through constructors. In our case, if we want every Person objects to be unique by id we will get the duplicate object if we use Object.clone() because Object.clone() will not call the constructor and final final id field can’t be modified from Person.clone().
class City implements Cloneable {
    private final int id;
    private String name;
    public City clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
    return (City) super.clone();

class Person implements Cloneable {
    public Person clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
        Person clonedObj = (Person) super.clone();
        clonedObj.name = new String(this.name);
        clonedObj.city = this.city.clone();
        return clonedObj;

Because of the above design issues with Object.clone() developers always prefer other ways to copy objects like using
  • BeanUtils.cloneBean(object) creates a shallow clone similar to Object.clone().
  • SerializationUtils.clone(object) creates a deep clone. (i.e. the whole properties graph is cloned, not only the first level), but all classes must implement Serializable.
  • Java Deep Cloning Library offers deep cloning without the need to implement Serializable.
All these options require the use of some external library plus these libraries will also be using Serialization or Copy Constructors or Reflection internally to copy our object. So if you don’t want to go with the above options or want to write our own code to copy the object then you can use
  1. Serialization
  2. Copy Constructors


As discussed in 5 different ways to create objects in Java, deserialising a serialised object creates a new object with the same state as in the serialized object. So similar to above cloning approaches we can achieve deep cloning functionality using object serialization and deserialization as well and with this approach we do not have worry about or write code for deep cloning, we get it by default.

We can do it like it is done below or we can also use other APIs like JAXB which supports serialization.

// Method to deep clone an object using in memory serialization.
public Employee copy(Person original) throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
    // First serializing the object and its state to memory using ByteArrayOutputStream instead of FileOutputStream.
    ByteArrayOutputStream bos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
    ObjectOutputStream out = new ObjectOutputStream(bos);

    // And then deserializing it from memory using ByteArrayOutputStream instead of FileInputStream,
    // Deserialization process will create a new object with the same state as in the serialized object.
    ByteArrayInputStream bis = new ByteArrayInputStream(bos.toByteArray());
    ObjectInputStream in = new ObjectInputStream(bis);
    return (Person) in.readObject();

However, cloning an object using serialization comes with some performance overhead and we can improve on it by using in-memory serialization if we just need to clone the object and don’t need to persist it in a file for future use, you can read more on How To Deep Clone An Object Using Java In Memory Serialization.

Copy Constructors

This method copying object is most popular between developer community it overcomes every design issue of Object.clone() and provides better control over object construction

public Person(Person original) {
    this.id = original.id + 1;
    this.name = new String(original.name);
    this.city = new City(original.city);

Advantages of copy constructors over Object.clone()

Copy constructors are better than Object.clone() because they
  • Don’t force us to implement any interface or throw any exception but we can surely do it if it is required.
  • Don’t require any type of cast.
  • Don’t require us to depend on an unknown object creation mechanism.
  • Don’t require parent class to follow any contract or implement anything.
  • Allow us to modify final fields.
  • Allow us to have complete control over object creation, we can write our initialization logic in it.
By using Copy constructors strategy, we can also create conversion constructors which can allow us to convert one object to another object e.g. ArrayList(Collection<? extends E> c) constructor generates an ArrayList from any Collection object and copy all items from Collection object to newly created ArrayList object.

Next Post Newer Posts Previous Post Older Posts Home